Dragana Rajkov-Šimić Dec 19, 2018:

Sadrže ili prenose?

Daryo Dec 19, 2018:

There's already enough context The context being the general way how PPP operate.

“At-risk” Long-Term Management or Service Contracts: Contracts whose scope is only maintaining or operating infrastructure or a service may be regarded as PPPs, as long as they transfer significant risks

"as long as they transfer significant risks" = that is part of the ideological BS used to justify PPP (Private Public Partnership) the idea being that the "private" part of PPP (private companies) are "taking risks" instead of the "public" part of the PPP. (for example, if it turns out that operating a railway line is not profitable, the private company is going to be hit with the losses, not the State)

In practice, more often than not, when private companies involved in PPP find themselves in trouble, they simply ask for "free help" from the State, and usually get it because otherwise it would create too much disruptions. (having to close a hospital build using PPP, stop operating a railway line in risk of bankruptcy etc...).

So in theory it would be something along the line of:

"уговори који садрже (знатан) елемент ризика"

Dragana Rajkov-Šimić Dec 18, 2018:

Malo više konteksta bi pomoglo